Article · Technology
The AI boom in numbers
Since 2010 the computing power used to train notable AI models has doubled every 5.7 months — ×4.3 a year, by a trend fitted to 481 models in Epoch AI's data. Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Oracle spent $691B on property and equipment in the four quarters to September 2026, 4.5 times as much as in the four quarters before ChatGPT's release. NVIDIA's revenue was $216B in fiscal 2026, 8.01 times as much as in fiscal 2023.
×4.3 a year since 2010, a trend fitted to 481 notable models; before 2010: every 20.5 months
GPT-6 Astra, OpenAI, Sep 2026
1 in 2019; 326 in all with an estimate
Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Oracle; $154B in the four quarters to September 2022
fiscal 2023: $27B; net income $120B, 56% of revenue
Training compute doubles every 5.7 months
Each dot is one of the 543 notable AI models for which Epoch AI has an estimate of training compute: the number of floating-point operations (FLOP) — additions and multiplications — that went into training it. They run from Theseus, Claude Shannon's maze-solving mechanical mouse of 1950, trained with 40 FLOP, to the largest so far, GPT-6 Astra by OpenAI (Sep 2026), at 9.4×10²⁶ FLOP.
The scale is logarithmic, so a straight line means steady exponential growth. A least-squares line through the 481 models published since 2010 rises ×4.3 a year: training compute doubled every 5.7 months, and ten years along the line multiply it 2.15M times. Through the 62 models before 2010 it rose ×1.5 a year, a doubling every 20.5 months. Frontier models — the five largest by compute when they came out — doubled every 5.4 months since 2010 (72 models).
The numbers are estimates. Epoch rates 59% of them confident (right within 3 times either way), 28% likely (within 10 times) and 12% speculative (within about 31 times); speculative ones are hollow dots. Without them, the trend since 2010 is a doubling every 5.6 months.
The trends as a table
| Models | Count | Doubling time | Growth a year | R² |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Notable models before 2010 | 62 | 20.5 months | ×1.5 | 0.69 |
| Notable models since 2010 | 481 | 5.7 months | ×4.3 | 0.66 |
| Frontier models since 2010 | 72 | 5.4 months | ×4.6 | 0.97 |
| Language models since 2010 | 302 | 4.9 months | ×5.5 | 0.68 |
| Since 2010, without speculative estimates | 422 | 5.6 months | ×4.4 | 0.67 |
Least squares of log₂ of training compute on the publication date in years; doubling time = 12 ÷ slope months, growth a year = 2^slope. R² is the share of the spread in log compute that the line explains.
The largest model of each year
A new compute record was set 24 times since 2010. The largest model of 2010, RNN LM, was trained with 5.4×10¹⁶ FLOP; GPT-6 Astra used 17.4B times as much.
Epoch AI also estimates the cost of the training compute for 178 of the models, in 2023 dollars. The highest estimate is $388M, for Grok 4 (xAI, 2025); over $100M: 3 models. The most power in the data, about 233 megawatts, was drawn by the 100,000 chips that trained GPT-6 Astra, by Epoch's estimate.
| Year | Model and developer | Training compute, FLOP | × the year before | Compute cost, 2023 $ |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2010 | RNN LMJohns Hopkins University · United States | 5.4×1016speculative | — | — |
| 2011 | CNN Committee (MNIST)IDSIA · Switzerland | 5.2×1016likely | ×0.96 | — |
| 2012 | Unsupervised High-level Feature LearnerGoogle · United States | 6.0×1017likely | ×11.5 | $16 |
| 2013 | DistBelief NNLMGoogle · United States | 2.6×1018likely | ×4.35 | $3.26K |
| 2014 | SNM-skipGoogle · United States | 3.0×1020speculative | ×114 | — |
| 2015 | AlphaGo FanDeepMind · United Kingdom | 3.8×1020likely | ×1.28 | $4.83K |
| 2016 | GNMTGoogle · United States | 6.6×1021likely | ×17.4 | $201K |
| 2017 | JFTGoogle Research, Carnegie Mellon University (CMU) · United States | 8.4×1020confident | ×0.13 | $17.9K |
| 2018 | ResNeXt-101 32x48dFacebook · United States | 8.7×1021confident | ×10.4 | $134K |
| 2019 | AlphaStarDeepMind · United Kingdom | 1.1×1023confident | ×12.3 | $131K |
| 2020 | GPT-3 175B (davinci)OpenAI · United States | 3.1×1023confident | ×2.91 | $2.12M |
| 2021 | FLAN 137BGoogle Research · United States | 2.0×1024confident | ×6.52 | — |
| 2022 | Minerva (540B)Google · United States | 2.7×1024confident | ×1.34 | — |
| 2023 | Gemini 1.0 UltraGoogle DeepMind · United States | 5.0×1025speculative | ×18.2 | $30.7M |
| 2024 | Llama 3.1-405BMeta AI · United States | 3.8×1025confident | ×0.76 | $52.9M |
| 2025 | Grok 4xAI · United States | 5.0×1026speculative | ×13.2 | $388M |
| 2026so far | GPT-6 AstraOpenAI · United States | 9.4×1026likely | ×1.88 | — |
The notable model with the most training compute published in each year; × the year before compares it with the previous year's largest. Under the compute: how sure Epoch AI is of the estimate. Cost: Epoch AI's estimate, where it has one.
The 10²³ FLOP club
Epoch AI keeps a list of large-scale models: those trained with over 10²³ FLOP, a fixed line some AI regulations use. It has a compute estimate for 326 of them. The first was AlphaStar in 2019; in 2025, 104 models crossed the line, after 101 in 2024.
The first models above the higher lines were Wu Dao 2.0 over 10²⁴ (2021), GPT-4 over 10²⁵ (2023) and Grok 3 over 10²⁶ (2025). Models over 10²⁵ FLOP published in 2025: 9. Of all 104 in the club that year, 90 were released with open weights — anyone can download and run them — and 10 only through an API or a hosted service; 4 were not released.
2026 is not over: to October 28, 2026 the list has 27 models with an estimate. Epoch adds new models within weeks and compute estimates later, so recent months fill in over time. It also lists 208 large-scale models without a compute estimate; they are not counted here.
The squares as a table
| Year | Over 10²³ | Over 10²⁴ | Over 10²⁵ | Over 10²⁶ | No estimate |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2020 | 2 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2021 | 10 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 0 |
| 2022 | 23 | 3 | 0 | 0 | 8 |
| 2023 | 58 | 17 | 3 | 0 | 63 |
| 2024 | 101 | 39 | 6 | 0 | 66 |
| 2025 | 104 | 71 | 9 | 3 | 61 |
| 2026so far | 27 | 25 | 7 | 1 | 10 |
Models with a compute estimate, by year of publication; a model over 10²⁵ FLOP also counts as over 10²⁴ and 10²³. No estimate: on Epoch's large-scale list without a compute figure.
Who builds them
Organizations in the United States worked on 135 of the 326 models over 10²³ FLOP and organizations in China on 139; next come South Korea (17), France (10) and United Arab Emirates (8). A model built by several organizations counts once for each of their countries.
The most came from Alibaba (36), Meta AI (24) and Nvidia (20). Groups are named as in the data, so Google's are counted apart: Google, Google DeepMind, Google Research, DeepMind and Google Brain.
Models with a compute estimate; a model counts once for each country and each organization it names. Organizations as Epoch AI names them.
Companies, not universities
Of the 109 notable models published in 2025, 92% came from companies alone, 5% from companies working with universities and 2% from universities alone. In 2010–2014, companies alone made 19% of them.
The money: Big Tech's capital spending
Training and running AI models takes data centers full of chips, and the companies that build the largest ones report the bill as capital expenditure: cash paid for property and equipment. Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Oracle together spent $691B in the four quarters to September 2026, 4.5 times as much as the $154B of the four quarters to September 2022 — the last quarter before ChatGPT was released on November 30, 2022. That is $1.89B a day, or $21,900 every second.
Measured against their size, the spending took 36% of the five companies' revenue in the latest four quarters, against 13% before, and 95% of the cash their operations brought in, against 54%. The largest spender was Amazon, with $215B.
The filings do not say how much of this went to AI. Capital expenditure also pays for offices and other buildings — at Amazon, warehouses and a delivery network too — and each company reports it under its own definitions.
Change against the four quarters to September 2022. Bars: capital expenditure by quarter since 2015, each company on its own scale. Over 100% of operating cash flow: more was spent than operations brought in. The cards link to the company pages.
Capital expenditure by calendar year
| Year | Microsoft | Alphabet | Amazon | Meta | Oracle | Total |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | $6.55B | $9.93B | $4.59B | $2.52B | $1.61B | $25.2B |
| 2016 | $9.11B | $10.2B | $6.74B | $4.49B | $1.6B | $32.2B |
| 2017 | $8.7B | $13.2B | $12B | $6.73B | $2.04B | $42.6B |
| 2018 | $14.2B | $25.1B | $13.4B | $13.9B | $1.47B | $68.2B |
| 2019 | $13.5B | $23.5B | $16.9B | $15.1B | $1.59B | $70.6B |
| 2020 | $17.6B | $22.3B | $40.1B | $15.2B | $1.83B | $97B |
| 2021 | $23.2B | $24.6B | $61.1B | $18.7B | $3.12B | $131B |
| 2022 | $24.8B | $31.5B | $63.6B | $31.2B | $6.68B | $158B |
| 2023 | $35.2B | $32.3B | $52.7B | $27B | $6.93B | $154B |
| 2024 | $55.6B | $52.5B | $83B | $37.3B | $10.7B | $239B |
| 2025 | $83.1B | $91.4B | $132B | $69.7B | $35.5B | $412B |
| 20263 quarters | $106B | $132B | $176B | $83.1B | $63.6B | $560B |
NVIDIA: selling the shovels
Epoch AI records the training hardware of 278 notable models published since 2020: 204 of them (73%) were trained on NVIDIA chips and 68 (24%) on Google's TPUs.
NVIDIA's fiscal year ends in late January: fiscal 2026 ran to January 25, 2026. Its revenue that year was $216B, 8.01 times as much as in fiscal 2023 ($27B), the year that ended 2 months after ChatGPT's release. Net income went from $4.37B (16% of revenue) to $120B (56%).
The latest quarter in the filings, Q2 FY2027 (to July 26, 2026), brought revenue of $96.2B and net income of $59.7B; 75% of revenue was left after the cost of what was sold (gross margin). The four quarters to July 26, 2026 add up to $303B of revenue and $193B of net income — at that pace, net income equal to NVIDIA's whole revenue of fiscal 2016 ($5.01B) came in every 9.5 days.
The SEC data used here give NVIDIA's total revenue, not its split by market, so the chart shows the total. The market value of NVIDIA shares held by the public — the public float on the cover of its annual report, not the market capitalization — was $434B at the end of July 2022 and $4.0T at the end of July 2025.
| Fiscal year | Revenue | Change | Gross margin | Net income | Net margin |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Fiscal 2016ended January 31, 2016 | $5.01B | +7% | 56.1% | $614M | 12.3% |
| Fiscal 2017ended January 29, 2017 | $6.91B | +38% | 58.8% | $1.67B | 24.1% |
| Fiscal 2018ended January 28, 2018 | $9.71B | +41% | 59.9% | $3.05B | 31.4% |
| Fiscal 2019ended January 27, 2019 | $11.7B | +21% | 61.2% | $4.14B | 35.3% |
| Fiscal 2020ended January 26, 2020 | $10.9B | −7% | 62.0% | $2.8B | 25.6% |
| Fiscal 2021ended January 31, 2021 | $16.7B | +53% | 62.3% | $4.33B | 26.0% |
| Fiscal 2022ended January 30, 2022 | $26.9B | +61% | 64.9% | $9.75B | 36.2% |
| Fiscal 2023ended January 29, 2023 | $27B | +0% | 56.9% | $4.37B | 16.2% |
| Fiscal 2024ended January 28, 2024 | $60.9B | +126% | 72.7% | $29.8B | 48.8% |
| Fiscal 2025ended January 26, 2025 | $130B | +114% | 75.0% | $72.9B | 55.8% |
| Fiscal 2026ended January 25, 2026 | $216B | +65% | 71.1% | $120B | 55.6% |
| Last four quartersto July 26, 2026 | $303B | 74.7% | $193B | 63.7% |
Questions people ask
How fast is AI growing?
One measure Epoch AI tracks for every notable model is training compute. Since 2010 it has doubled every 5.7 months — ×4.3 a year, by a least-squares trend over 481 models. Before 2010 it doubled every 20.5 months.
What is a FLOP in AI?
A floating-point operation: one addition or multiplication of decimal numbers. Training compute is the total done to train a model: GPT-6 Astra took about 9.4×10²⁶ FLOP by Epoch AI's estimate, Theseus of 1950 took 40.
How much does it cost to train an AI model?
Epoch AI estimates the cost of the training compute for 178 notable models, in 2023 dollars. The highest is $388M, for Grok 4 (2025); the median of the 7 estimates for models published in 2025 is $44.6M. The figures cover compute only.
How much are tech companies spending on AI data centers?
The filings report capital expenditure as a whole, not the part for AI. Microsoft, Alphabet, Amazon, Meta and Oracle spent $691B in the four quarters to September 2026, against $154B in the four quarters to September 2022; the largest spender was Amazon ($215B).
How much money does NVIDIA make?
In fiscal 2026, to January 25, 2026, revenue was $216B and net income $120B. In the four quarters to July 26, 2026: revenue $303B, net income $193B.
Go deeper
How the numbers are calculated
- AI models: Epoch AI, ‘Data on AI models’. Published online at epoch.ai. Retrieved from https://epoch.ai/data/ai-models [online resource]. Accessed November 9, 2026. License CC BY 4.0: free to use, distribute and reproduce with credit to Epoch AI. Charts, trends and counts on this page are calculated by BigCapital.
- Training compute: floating-point operations used to train a model, as the developer reports it or as Epoch AI estimates it from the hardware and training time or from the model's size and training data. Confidence, Epoch's 90% ranges: confident within 3 times, likely within 10, speculative within about 31.
- Trends: ordinary least squares of log₂ (training compute) on the publication date in years, for notable models with an estimate; doubling time = 12 ÷ slope months, growth a year = 2^slope. “Since 2010”: published from 1 January 2010. A record: more compute than every earlier notable model.
- Notable models: Epoch's list of models that advanced the state of the art, were highly cited, historically relevant or widely used; frontier models were in the top 5 by training compute when released. Large-scale models: Epoch's list of models over 10²³ FLOP, counted by year of publication and once for each country and organization named.
- Company figures: SEC EDGAR, XBRL company facts of the 10-K and 10-Q filings (public domain).
- Capital expenditure: payments to acquire property and equipment in the cash flow statement, under the XBRL tag each company uses; a quarter not reported on its own is the year to date minus the previous year to date. Revenue, net income, gross profit and operating cash flow as filed. Amazon, Q2 2017: not in the XBRL data, so it is the fiscal year minus its other three quarters.
- Fiscal years as the companies name them: NVIDIA's fiscal 2026 ended on January 25, 2026. The capital spending chart uses calendar quarters.
- Past figures are history, not a forecast. Nothing here is investment advice.